Already a member?
Sign in
wrapup and review |
Version 2 - view current page
- We were able to share experiences across library types so was good to share with people outside our group - whether that is public, academic, special, or other.
- Shannon astutely observes that there was a lot that sounded good - but limited time. More sessions!
- Initially reluctant but enjoyed - was able to learn from others in different libraries.
- In an unconference-type situation we weren't able to cover all the related topics - pros and cons to the setup. Blended approach combining best of the traditional conference and the unconference concept.
- Being able to share in groups is a bonus - getting to talk about what we wanted to talk about.
- We were able to be more timely - things that are important now rather than 6 months or a year in the past? Observation about other conferences asking for program info a year or more prior.
- This experience was a chance to communicate rather than to passively consume information.
- Lunch bunches were popular - having a free-flow exchange with others that you don't normally see was good, getting out of the typical groups?
- Being the only person in your building can be isolating - the unconference helped those in smaller work groups connect
- Recommendation - grab people you don't know and have lunch, get out of that typical circle of folks - we can do this even at more structured conferences.
- Connecting with people who do similar things outside of regions, systems, buildings
- What next?
- We have a wiki!!! (you're reading it)
- Can add to the pages from each session
